Amazon Listing Audit Example: Acacia Cutting Board

This is the free review you’d get for your listing, done on a real one. I left out the brand.

Every image, and every slide that’s missing, gets the buyer’s question and a verdict: Yes, Partly or No. Then the review themes with their counts, 3 competitors from the same search, what isn’t an image problem, and the 3 fixes I’d make first. I work from the public page only, so I need no Seller Central access.

Symptom

The listing sells: “300+ bought in past month”, 4.4 stars from 1,500+ ratings, 73 % of them five stars. Buyers like the look: 62 of 67 appearance mentions are positive. But durability is the only topic where negative mentions outnumber positive ones: 44 of 65. One review says:

“about half of the boards are cracked”

Texture is nearly an even split (9 negative of 19), and cleaning isn’t far off (8 of 19). Size gets 14 negative of 59. The gallery has 5 images, all of the same empty board on white: no food, no hand, nothing to compare it with. A picture can’t stop a board from cracking. So the question for the gallery: does it tell the buyer what they’re getting, meaning the size in use, what the board is made of and how to look after it?

Gallery, slot by slot

Slot 1 · main image

“Is this a wooden board with a handle?”

The board alone on white, lying flat at a three-quarter angle, with a jute hanging cord.

YesYou can tell what it is at a glance.
Slot 2

“What does the wood look like?”

The board standing upright, from the front, on white.

YesBuyers like the look: 62 of 67 appearance mentions are positive, the highest share of any topic. But it’s the second photo of the same empty board.
Slot 3

“How much room do I get to cut on?”

The board flat, seen from above at an angle, on white.

PartlyYou see the whole surface, but empty, with nothing to judge its size by. It’s the third angle of the same empty board.
Slot 4

“Is it thick and solid?”

The board edge-on, from a low angle.

PartlyYou see the thickness, but not the number: 0.75 in appears only on slot 5. Nothing says whether it’s one piece of wood or glued strips. One review says “Used it once and it split” and wished for “a single piece of wood instead of one glued together”.
Slot 5

“Is it the size I need?”

A three-quarter view with thin black dimension lines labelled 15″, 7″ and “0.75- Height”.

PartlyThe numbers match the page’s Product Dimensions (15 × 7 × 0.75 in). But the labels are small, nothing sits next to the board for scale, and the image is wider than tall (1385 × 934 px), so it shows smaller in the square frame (my read). One review says the board was “smaller than expected”; another calls it a “Perfect size!… for cutting fruit or other little things”.
Missing slide

“What can I cut or serve on it?”

No slide.

NoThe bullets name meat, vegetables, fruit, bread, cheese and charcuterie, and one review says it “Works well for vegies, bread, and meats”. No image shows food or a hand; all 3 competitors do.
Missing slide

“Is it one solid piece, and what’s the finish?”

No slide.

NoBullet 3 says “100% hard acacia wood”; none of the 5 images says how it’s built or what the finish is. One review says it “came with a weird coating”; another, “Holes filled with putty. Poor quality, not food safe.” One competitor puts “Food safe finish” and “Oiled and ready to use” on an image; another says wood color and grain “may vary slightly”.
Missing slide

“How do I clean it? Can it go in the dishwasher?”

No slide.

NoCare is only in the text, and the text disagrees with itself: bullet 5 says “do not wash… wipe with damp fabric”, the specs say “Hand Wash Only”. One review says it needs “regular oiling and hand-washing”.

Want this table for your listing? Free, within 2 working days.

Get my free review

What buyers say: Amazon’s review summary

Amazon’s AI review summary (1,500+ ratings, 4.4 stars). The counts come from that summary; the quotes are the review snippets Amazon shows under each topic.

Topic	Mentions	Negative	In the gallery
Durabilityone review says “It is not flat and rocks when you cut on it”	65	44	no; the snippets point to the product, see below
Quality	113	28	slots 1–5 show the board; nothing on the finish
Sizeone review says “smaller than expected”	59	14	slot 5: small labels, nothing for scale
Value for money	33	11	not an image question
Textureone review says “Rough and started to show splotches”	19	9	not in the 5 images (A+ not checked)
Ease of cleaningone review says “no dishwasher cleaning”	19	8	not in the 5 images (A+ not checked)
Appearance	67	5	slots 1–5
Functionality	20	3	no image shows it in use

What competitors show

Same search, same day: a smaller 13.7 × 7 in board (≈ $10, 4.4 stars, 600+ ratings) · a large 17 × 13 in board (≈ $30, 4.7 stars, 1,600+ ratings) · a mid-priced board (≈ $20, 4.6 stars, 900+ ratings)

All 3 show food and hands: bread, tomatoes, onion, steak and cheese being cut, charcuterie being served.
All 3 put dimensions on an image, like this listing, so the numbers aren’t the difference. One puts a banana next to the board for scale.
Two put the uses into words: “ONE BOARD, MANY USES”, “DUAL PURPOSE cutting and serving board”.
One says on an image that “Each piece has a unique texture” and “Wood color and grain may vary slightly”. Another states “Oiled and ready to use” and “Food safe finish”.
All 3 have 8 or more images; this listing has 5.

What isn’t an image problem

Cracks, splits, chipped wood. Reviews describe cracked and split boards, a board that rocks, and “Wood around the handle is chipped”. That’s the wood, the gluing and quality control (my read). Images can’t fix it. They can only say honestly what the board is made of and how to look after it.
Care advice that disagrees with itself. Bullet 5 says “We Recommend do not wash”; the specs say “Hand Wash Only”. That’s listing text, so fix it there first. Then a care slide has one answer to show.
The finish. One review says “The finish wore off right away”; another, that the finish “was not one you could use for cutting food on”. Which finish goes on the board is a supplier question. An image can state it once you know it, and a “food safe” claim needs proof behind it.

When the fix is listing text or listing data, that’s my listing copy work; every project starts with this same free review.

If this were your listing, I’d change these 3 things first

Show it in use, with food and a hand: bread or vegetables being cut, cheese served on it. That’s what bullets 1 and 4 already promise, and what all 3 competitors show. Keep the food true to scale: two reviews call it a good size for fruit and small prep work. Swap two of the empty-board angles (slots 2–4) for these.
One slide on the wood and its care: acacia, one piece or glued strips (whichever is true), the finish it has, that grain and color vary; then how to clean, dry and oil it. Make bullet 5 and the specs agree first. One review ties care to cracking: oiling and hand-washing “to prevent it from drying out or cracking”.
Make slot 5 readable: bigger 15 × 7 × 0.75 in labels and something everyone knows the size of next to the board (one competitor uses a banana), on a square canvas (it’s 1385 × 934 px now).

Get the same review for your listing. Send an ASIN, the marketplace (for example amazon.com or amazon.de) and an email: free, within 2 working days, and yours to keep.

ASIN or listing URL

Marketplace

Add a note (optional)

Anything I should know?

For example what worries you about this listing, or that you’d like a price for new images.

Rather talk first? Book a 30-minute call

Free, within 2 working days. I work from your public listing page: no Seller Central access needed.

I use the details you send in this form to answer your enquiry and to protect the form from spam. I don’t use them for newsletters or marketing, and I don’t sell them. Read the Privacy Policy and Cookie Policy. This form is protected by reCAPTCHA; Google’s Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

How this was made: the listing as a shopper sees it on amazon.com in a desktop browser, viewed from Denmark, not signed in (prices converted from DKK, so approximate). Review counts and quotes are Amazon’s AI summary and the review snippets it shows, as displayed on 21 Oct 2026. Competitors come from one search for “acacia wood cutting board with handle”, organic results, no paid tools; for the two with more than 9 gallery entries I looked at the first 9. The A+ section (12 images) wasn’t reviewed, so some answers may be there. The buyer’s questions, the verdicts and what counts as an image problem are my reading, not a measurement. The gallery map above is my own drawing, not the seller’s images.